By Diana Anderson, Writer/ Editor, Argonne National Laboratory
Argonne National Laboratory recently constructed a 95 kW solar array on its campus. The solar farm provides renewable power for the laboratory's Emergency Operations Center, saving about $9,400 and 94 metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions annually. The solar array also doubles as a test bed for scientific research.
Argonne nanoscientist Seth Darling is using the new solar array to study how various types of solar panels perform in the Midwest region. “There’s an absence of good, objective performance comparative data, particularly in the Midwest,” said Darling. “That sort of information is good for everyone to have — homeowners, business owners, and so on.”
Argonne has already partnered with the Illinois Tollway on a joint energy study focusing on solar panel research. Argonne’s Midwest Photovoltaic Analysis Facility Initiative, of which Seth Darling is a part, studies multiple solar panel technologies located at the Illinois Tollway’s Downers Grove headquarters. The goal of the initiative is to evaluate how solar technologies perform in the Midwest region under various environmental conditions.
“We’re using six to eight different types of panel technologies in our research partnership with the Illinois Tollway,” said Darling. “So, we’re getting some good data, but not very strong statistics because there are such a small number of panels in the study.”
To alleviate this problem, Darling worked with Argonne’s Sustainability Program Office to have a variety of solar panel technologies installed as part of the laboratory’s on-site solar farm infrastructure. Argonne’s solar array is ten times larger than the array located at the Tollway’s headquarters and it uses three types of panel technologies.
“Argonne’s larger solar array will enable us to collect more reliable data,” said Darling. “We’ve also set up lots of weather data-gathering technology stations as part of the solar array.”
Weather data will be collected as part of Darling’s solar panel performance study. Each solar panel is equipped with a temperature sensor, dynamometers will measure wind, and pyrometers will measure sunlight or insolation — the measure of solar radiation energy received on a surface area.
“One of the things we’d like to determine is which types of panels perform better in higher or lower levels of light,” said Darling.
The Midwest’s seasonal weather fluctuations make solar harvesting a challenging activity, but researchers like Darling are attempting to determine which types of panels perform better in the region. This type of data is essential for determining the future of next-generation solar technology and can directly affect the course of the market to come.
https://enlighten.enphaseenergy.com/public/systems/yuD934827
I know that progress is great, but I wonder if it is worth it. After all, isn't this the same technology that President Obama invested so much of our tax dollars in and then those companies went bankrupt (Solyndra).
Quote: "Most research on basic scientific topics – in physics, biology, chemistry, etc. – does not have immediate commercial applications and so this work is highly dependent on government funding. Federal funds pay for 80% of the basic science research in this country, through laboratory facilities in universities and in government agencies such as the National Institutes for Health."
The Chinese are able to produce much cheaper components because of basically slave labor and a lack of environmental regulations. If and when solar technology becomes a good idea then you'll see plenty of private companies promoting it, just like the space program right now. Solyndra was given hundreds of millions of dollars of taxpayer money and still couldn't create solar panels that were financially feasible in the market. The chemicals and processes used in creating solar panels are extremely caustic and likely to harm the environment more that most people would like to admit.
Same as it ever was.
Is it the difference in a year’s worth of electricity bills before and after? Is it that difference less the cost of the PV array (spread over its expected lifespan)? Is it that difference, less array cost, less the cost of money for the investment? The cost of an installed 95kW PV array (exclusive of government subsidies) is about $522,500, so, until I see some details on where that $9,400 annual savings figure comes from I’m going to doubt that it is a realistic number.